Compatibility list for Sea2Soil
1 Summary
The objective of the study was to evaluate the physical compatibility of Sea2Soil as a tank mixture with various registered products / adjuvants.
Physical compatibility tests were conducted using the dynamic laboratory test of the physical compatibility of tank mixtures as devised by ASTM International, method E1518-05 Standard Practice for Evaluation of Physical Compatibility of Pesticides in Aqueous Tank Mixtures by the Dynamic Shaker Method.
The results have been interpreted in strict accordance with the published method, under the parameters of this practice, the results will define whether the pesticide mixture is or is not compatible in the laboratory, compatibility or incompatibility in the field should be confirmed under field conditions.
The results are presented in full in Section 4.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Significance and Use
This practice is designed for researchers, applicators, and end users of pesticides where one or more ingredients are being mixed into an aqueous spray system. The practice is useful in determining physical compatibility of aqueous spray mixtures of pesticides and/or fertilizers.
The practice is not designed to determine physical compatibility of non-aqueous based spray mixtures.
The results or the testing should be used to determine the compatibility of the mixture ingredients in dynamic applications. Interpolation of static results to the expectations of the results of this test is not encouraged.
2.2 Scope
This practice describes the method for the evaluation of the physical compatibility and stability of pesticide tank mixtures diluted for aqueous application. This practice may also be adapted to use with liquid fertilizers in replacement of the water diluent.
Tank mix compatibility can be affected by many variables. Care should be taken to duplicate test conditions.
This practice addresses the standard variables such as time, temperature, water hardness, method of agitation, and degree of agitation.
Compatibility is complex and can be affected by other variables such as order of addition, pH of the dilution water, pumping shear, etc. Under the parameters of this practice, the results will define whether the pesticide mixture is or is not compatible in the laboratory. Compatibility or incompatibility should also be confirmed under field spray conditions.
Proper safety and hygiene precautions must be taken when working with pesticide formulations to prevent skin or eye contact, vapour inhalation, and environmental contamination.
Read and follow all handling instructions for the specific formulation and conduct the test in accordance with good laboratory practice.
The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
This standard does not purport to address all of the safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
2.3 Summary of Practice
In this practice, pesticides are diluted in water and tank mixed at specific application rates. Evaluations are conducted under dynamic conditions. Pesticides are mixed and kept under agitation by a mechanical shaker running at 385 oscillations per minute. Evaluations are conducted at chosen water hardnesses and temperatures. Compatibility is measured in terms of the dispersion stability and screen residue.
Pesticides being examined for mixing compatibility should be evaluated individually as controls.
Order of Addition-Pesticides should be tank mixed as recommended on the product label. If the order of the addition is not specified, then all possible orders of addition should be tested. The following is a general guide: (1) water soluble concentrates, (2) water dispersible granules (dry flowables), (3) wettable powders, (4) liquid flowables, and (5) emulsifiable concentrates.
This practice, E1518-05 (Reapproved 2019), is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E35 on Pesticides, Antimicrobials and Alternative Control Agents and is the direct responsibility of subcommittee E35.22 on Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems.
2.4 Reagents
Purity of Reagents
Reagent grade chemicals shall be used in all tests. Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that all reagents shall conform to the specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society where such specifications are available.
Other grades may be used, provided it is first ascertained that the reagent is of sufficiently high purity to permit its use without lessening the accuracy of the determination.
Purity of water
Unless otherwise indicated, references to water shall be understood to mean reagent water as defined by type IV of Specification D 1193.
Synthetic hard water stock
To be made following the instructions given in the ASTM method. This mixture is equivalent to ppm calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and is based on a compositional ratio of 4:1 calcium carbonate to magnesium carbonate.
2.5 Test and Reference Item(s)
Product Name | Active Ingredient(s) | Content of A.I Nominal | Formulation Type |
---|
Sea2Soil | Nitrogen Minerals Trace elements Amino Acids | N/D | LI |
Nirvana | Imazamox Pendimethalin | 16.7 g/L 250 g/L | EC |
Tower | Chlorotoluron Diflufenican Pendimethalin | 250 g/L 40 g/L 300 g/L | SC |
Cadou Met | Diflufenican Flufenacet Metribuzin | 60 g/L 240 g/L 70 g/L | SC |
Chronicle | Pendimethalin Picolinafen | 320 g/L 16 g/L | SC |
Pontos | Flufenacet Picolinafen | 240 g/L 100 g/L | SC |
Tebucur 250 | Tebuconazole | 250 g/L | EW |
Arizona | Folpet | 500 g/L | SC |
Lybro | Pyclostrobin | 200 g/L | EC |
Laminone | Laminarin | 37 g/L | SL |
Tacazana Era | Benzovindiflupyr Prothioconazole | 75 g/L 150 g/L | EC |
Diadem XE | Fluxapyroxad Mefentrifluconazole | 47.5 g/L 100 g/L | EC |
Vimoy | Isoflucypram | 50 g/L | EC |
2.6 Procedure
Dynamic Shaker Method
- 100ml water of desired hardness less the total amount of pesticide specified in points 2 and 4 was transferred into a 120ml (4oz) jar.
Note 1 - Temperature was maintained a 25 +/- 20C throughout the test. - A specified amount, according to the product label directions, of the first pesticide was added to the jar. Liquid pesticides were delivered with a pipette and solid pesticides were weighed in.
- The jar was swirled to ensure that the first pesticide was well dispersed.
- A specified amount, according to the product label directions, of each additional pesticide was added to the jar used in point 1. Delivered as in point 2. After each pesticide addition, the jar was capped and swirled sufficiently to disperse the mixture.
- The jar was placed in the shaker. The jar was perpendicular and at an approximately 45° angle to the horizontal shaft of the shaker.
- The jar was shaken for 30 minutes at 385 oscillations per minute.
- The jar was removed from the shaker and swirled; the contents was poured immediately through a 50- mesh (300 micron) sieve. An observation was made for residue remaining both on the sieve and in the jar, amount and type were recorded as described in Section 3.
- The jar was rinsed with two 50ml portions of test water, each was poured through the 50-mesh sieve. An observation was made for residue as in point 7.
- The contents was discarded in a safe manner.
3 Reporting of Results
The results of this practice are reported as either compatible or incompatible;
Compatible - The formulation of a well-dispersed mixture of pesticides in water. No non-rinsable residue found on the 50-mesh sieve or remaining on bottle walls should be considered compatible.
Incompatible - Separation of the mixture of pesticides in water where flocculation, coagulation, gel or curd found during or at the end of the test that will not re-disperse nor pass through the 50-mesh sieve should be considered incompatible. Any residue as described previously found remaining on the bottle should be considered incompatible.
4 Results of Test
This report details the result of a dynamic laboratory test of the physical compatibility of tank mixtures as devised by the ASTM International Method E1518-05 Standard Practice for Evaluation of Physical Compatibility of Pesticides in Aqueous Tank Mixtures by the Dynamic Shaker Method.
The results have been interpreted in strict accordance with the published method, resulting in a compatible or incompatible result. The ultimate decision whether the difference in the mixture represents a significant change from the products tested alone rests with the Sponsor, and should be confirmed with field based tests.
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Nirvana | 4.500 L/ha | 2.250 mL | No residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 5.000 mL | No residue |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | No residue |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 150 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Tower | 2.000 L/ha | 1.333 mL | No residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 6.667 mL | No residue |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | No residue |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 100 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Cadou Met | 1.000 L/ha | 1.000 mL | No residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 5.000 mL | Miniscule amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | Similar amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Chronicle | 3.000 L/ha | 1.500 mL | 1 flake left on sieve |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 5.000 mL | No Residue |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | 1 flake left on sieve |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Proclus | 1.400 L/ha | 0.700 mL | No Residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 5.000 mL | No Residue |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | Miniscule amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Tebucon | 1.000 L/ha | 1.000 mL | No Residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 10.000 mL | Miniscule amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | Similar amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Arizona | 1.500 L/ha | 0.750 mL | No Residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 5.000 mL | No Residue |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | No Residue |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Lybro | 1.250 L/ha | 0.625 mL | No Residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 5.000 mL | No Residue |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | No Residue |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Laminone | 1.000 L/ha | 2.000 mL | No Residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 20.000 mL | Miniscule amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | Similar amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Tacanza Era | 1.000 L/ha | 1.000 mL | No Residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 10.000 mL | Miniscule amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | Similar amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Diadem XE | 1.500 L/ha | 1.500 mL | No Residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 10.000 mL | Miniscule amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | Similar amount of residue on sieve, rinsed off |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible
Study Number : | S24-101770-03 |
Tested By: | E. Osborne | Date: | 10 Dec 2024 |
Spray Volume: | 200 L/ha |
Mixing Order | Product | Rate Product/ha | Rate Product/100ml | Results & Comments After 30mins |
---|
1 | Vimoy | 1.500 L/ha | 1.000 mL | No Residue |
2 | Sea2Soil | 10.000 L/ha | 6.667 mL | No Residue |
Mixture | As above | As above | As above | No Residue |
Test result (PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation, I = Incompatible) | PC/CA |
Key to symbols used in Results column above
- PC/CA = Physically compatible with continuous agitation
- I = Incompatible